Recently US President George W. Bush claimed: "This is a moment of clarity for all Palestinians, and now comes a moment of choice... There is the vision of Hamas, which the world saw in
Pres. Bush has obscured that fact that party alliances are largely contingent on familial and ethnic loyalties. There are important linguistic, historic, and even physiognomic differences between members of the Hamas clan and the members of the Fatah clan. A 'Palestinian' is hardly more able to choose his party than a Tug Fork resident could choose to be a Hatfield or a McCoy. (So how can the persons referred to as 'Palestinian' be understood as constituting a national group?)
The facts of this rivalry are highly inconvenient for the Imperialists of Democracy.
Hamas and Fatah are called the political parties of the Palestinians; but since a 'Palestinian' is not able to choose his allegiance – or at least not safely, this system lacks the rational decision-making critical for democracy. The West, however, wants to claim that the Palestinians are democratic. And since they are democratic, they must believe that negotiation, compromise, and peaceful turnover of power are possible. And since they believe that negotiation, compromise, and peaceful turnover of power are possible, they must be able to negotiate, compromise, and make peace with
Why do this?
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento